Assumable Mortgage vs. Subject To Financing

General Advice

AUG 03, 2023

When it comes to real estate transactions, buyers and sellers have a variety of financing options to consider. Two commonly encountered terms are "Assumable Mortgage" and "Subject-to Financing." While both methods involve the transfer of property ownership, they differ significantly in how the existing mortgage is handled during the transfer process.

Assumable Mortgage

An assumable mortgage is a type of financing arrangement that allows a homebuyer to take over the existing mortgage terms from the seller. In other words, the buyer assumes responsibility for the remaining balance of the mortgage, monthly payments, and interest rate without the need to obtain a new loan. Assumable mortgages were more common in the past when interest rates were higher and served as an attractive option for buyers looking to secure a favorable loan.

Pros of Assumable Mortgages

a. Lower Interest Rates: If the existing mortgage has a lower interest rate than the current market rates, the buyer can benefit from significant savings over the life of the loan.

b. Reduced Closing Costs: Since the buyer doesn't need to apply for a new mortgage, certain closing costs associated with loan origination may be avoided or minimized.

c. Faster Closing Process: Assuming an existing mortgage can lead to a quicker closing process, as there is no need for lender approval or lengthy underwriting procedures.

Cons of Assumable Mortgages

a. Limited Availability: Assumable mortgages are not as prevalent in today's real estate market, making them harder to find.

b. Qualification Requirements: The buyer must still meet the lender's qualification standards to assume the mortgage, including creditworthiness and financial stability.

Subject-to Financing

Subject-to financing, on the other hand, is a more creative financing arrangement where the buyer agrees to purchase the property "subject to" the existing mortgage. In this scenario, the seller remains responsible for the mortgage, but the buyer takes ownership of the property. The existing mortgage stays in the seller's name, and the buyer makes monthly payments directly to the seller, who then pays the lender.

Pros of Subject-to Financing

a. No Need for New Loan Approval: Since the buyer does not apply for a new mortgage, there's no need to undergo lender scrutiny or meet stringent loan requirements.

b. Flexible Terms: The buyer and seller have more flexibility in negotiating the terms of the transaction, such as the down payment amount and payment schedule.

c. Easier for Sellers: Subject-to financing can be an attractive option for sellers who want to offload their property quickly, even if they are facing financial challenges or have an existing mortgage with favorable terms.

Cons of Subject-to Financing

a. Potential Risks for Buyers: Buyers must thoroughly research the property's title and ensure the seller remains committed to paying the existing mortgage. Failure on the seller's part to make timely mortgage payments could lead to foreclosure and jeopardize the buyer's investment.

b. Due-on-Sale Clause: Most mortgages have a "due-on-sale" clause, allowing the lender to demand immediate payment of the loan if the property is sold. While lenders may not always enforce this clause, it remains a risk for buyers in subject-to transactions.

This content is meant for informational purposes only and is not intended to be construed as financial, tax, legal, or insurance advice.


Book an appointment

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.